“Tucker highlights attacks on Whites while also highlighting that Whites organizing to do anything about it would be ‘Nazi-like'” (a comment to this article)
Tucker is especially disturbed by the prospect of “White identity politics.”
“We’ve never at any point in American history had all segments of elite culture united in their contempt for, loathing of, really, White men, and I just don’t think this ends well, and I think the only way to stop it is by not putting up with it even for a second…what you’re doing is creating White identity politics…I don’t want that…once everyone has an identity, then White people are going to create identity politics on their own. Do you really want that?”
At 31:14 minutes — it should be cued:
Thanks for discussing the targeting of White men, Tucker, but yes, in this era of White Genocide we really do want Whites to organize and act collectively!
How else will Whites prevent their race being blended out of existence by anti-Whites’ program of mass non-White immigration and forced assimilation?
Oh, your remedy for actions taken against Whites is for individual Whites “to not put up with it even for a second”!
As if individual Whites doing exactly that for a good while now has resulted in anything more than multitudes of Whites losing their employment and worse!
You don’t send soldiers onto a battlefield as lone individuals to be picked off by the enemy one by one! You send soldiers onto a battlefield as an organized group that supports each other and exerts a combined force against the enemy!
There’s a strange idea abroad even among many White people that it’s immoral and contemptible for White people to love their race and want to save it.
Hopefully Tucker doesn’t feel that way, but the opposition of Tucker and others to “White identity politics” has contributed greatly to stripping Whites of the sense of racial identity that’s needed to resist White Genocide.
Of course other races are allowed to express all the self-identity they wish, whether Tucker approves or not.
Tucker also makes the strange assumption that you can have a multiracial society without having identity politics.
Consider this from Singapore’s inaugural prime minister Lee Kuan Yew:
But Tucker’s inner liberal has whispered in his ear the lie that human nature can be changed!
“There is no place in America for identity politics” just repeats Chris Rufo‘s unrealistic urgings for a “colorblind America.”
These futile denials of human nature are applauded by anti-Whites, who want Whites to continue denying their existence as Whites so that completing White Genocide will be easy.
Chris Rufo hammers “colorblindness” to slip support for White Genocide into DeSantis’s campaign
If White people are blocked from feeling their White identity so strictly that they don’t even care about White Genocide, then the other work of Tucker Carlson and Chris Rufo will amount to only this:
White Americans split over their core issue — “What kind of America do we want to leave to our future Mexican majority?”
A few days ago Tucker caused a stir by using the anti-White slur “Nazi” several times when being interviewed by Adam Carolla.
Hey Tucker, don’t strengthen anti-Whites’ slurs by using them yourself!
We should strengthen pro-White expressions by using them. For example, when appropriate, use the term “anti-White,” and without tacking onto it anti-Whites’ mighty r-word!
The mighty r-word is the chief weapon with which anti-Whites have conquered and now rule us. If we use it ourselves, we grant it validity and help deliver its anti-White baggage. We need to charge anti-Whites with anti-Whiteism over and over until that term becomes normalized!
When anti-Whites call you any of their derogatory terms, this is a suitable reply:
“That word is just a slur that anti-Whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide.”
But in the Carolla interview, Tucker associates anti-Whites’ most ferocious slur with well-intentioned Whites who might presume to speak for White people as a group!
Hey Tucker, helping anti-Whites maintain the validity of their derogatory terms by using those terms ourselves is just stupid! And labeling the innocent actions of other White people with those terms is way beyond stupid!
“Whites are going to be a minority soon, so what that means is you’re going to get people standing up and saying, ‘I’m the candidate of the White voter.’ I’m going to tell that person to fuck off. Nobody speaks for me because he shares the same skin color as me. This idea that someone of a certain skin color speaks automatically on behalf of all people who share that skin color is a Nazi idea.”
36:11 – 37:15, it should be cued:
Noted pro-White thinker Wang Lin, treading softly but sure-footedly on Twitter, gave Tucker these replies:
“Whites are under attack because they are white, which creates a need for a collective defense.”
“People have always organized based on commonalities and shared interests.
“Whites should organize to defend the collective interests of whites and to protect one another against people who want to harm whites.”
“Everyone telling you you are evil if you want to organize to protect yourself by coming together with people similar to you wants to hurt you. They want you to be isolated so you are weak.
“The people telling you it is evil if whites organize are themselves organized racially.”
“It’s a lot easier to be an individual with no need for anyone to represent your interests when you’re worth $100 million.
“If you’ve only got $100 in the bank, you might really feel like you need someone to defend you.
“To that Tucker Carlson says: fuck you, you ‘Nazi.'”
It’s below Wang Lin’s status to mention Carlson’s juvenile falsehood from leftist la-la land, the goofy idea that races are distinct only in skin color. Tucker thinks we’re morons.
When distinct races share the same territory, racial identity politics is inevitable.
Unlike other races, Whites have had much of their feeling of racial identity conditioned out of them by propaganda from anti-White media, schools, etc.
Anti-Whites’ current program of White Genocide makes it extremely necessary that Whites escape their anti-White conditioning, recognize their existence as Whites, and act politically to preserve their group!
In addition to the tactical carelessness of validating anti-White terminology by using it, leaders like Tucker support White Genocide by attempting to block Whites from organizing to protect and save their race!
We need leaders who encourage us to organize to save our race!
Where does this madness come from? A principal source is entertainment media and other institutions that have bludgeoned Tucker and all the rest of us for decades with “slavery! slavery! slavery! Holocaust! Holocaust! Holocaust! Hitler! Hitler! Hitler! Nazi! Nazi! Nazi!” This very determined campaign that anti-Whites have waged to own our minds has achieved its goal — many Whites now feel a sort of self-hatred, and recoil in horror at any suggestion that they should organize politically to avoid being blended out of existence.
Absurdly, events from a past that no longer exists now occupy such a large part of our brains that even a figure like Tucker apparently can’t give an interview without unnecessarily saying “Nazi” several times!
Long dead events that should lie quietly in their graves are exhumed and put on garish display. Their phony currency undergirds today’s White self-hatred that anti-Whites have elaborately trained White people to feel.
We need leaders who are perceptive enough to see how absurd all that is, and who have the ability to lead us out of it!
Imagine what the effect would be if tomorrow Tucker stated on his program that White people need to organize to halt White Genocide before it’s too late.
What are Tucker and all the other high-salaried media “conservatives” doing exactly, if that’s not the movement they’re leading?
Finally, once again:
When anti-Whites call you a derogatory term, reply with this:
“That word is just a slur that anti-Whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide.”
Hey, Tucker Carlson! You give White Genocide a pass when you call it “replacement”!
The graphics in this article are also links
Hero journalist Glenn Greenwald finds Tucker Carlson’s positive words about White men “problematic in the extreme”!
Tucker’s lack of logic in the Schmidt interview is disheartening. It seems to be all about how good he feels about himself when he stands up as a rugged individual.
If he wants to be a very rugged individual, he could stand up against White Genocide.
Nick Fuentes has an excellent 15-minute commentary on Carolla’s interview of Tucker (7:40 – 23:07). He covers the fact that virtually all media figures on the right, like Tucker, function as gatekeepers rather than pipelines, i.e. as firewalls against audiences learning anything that the media companies don’t want them to learn, rather than as stepping stones toward moving on to bigger truths that are available elsewhere (like at the present site).
Nick also says that we’ve been fooling ourselves thinking that Tucker’s beliefs go deeper than what he actually states on air, as has been evidenced by his unscripted remarks made in interviews (I’ve noticed this too).
Nick’s comedic (?) forecast of where Tucker will be in a couple of years:
‘Must watch Tucker monologue! Tucker Carlson owns the Nazis!
‘Here’s why the sexual marketplace for dating should be a colorblind meritocracy!’”
When Ye launches his presidential campaign (if he does), will Tucker respond as he did regarding his interview with Ye in October, 2022?
“In fact, we’ve rarely heard a man speak so honestly and so movingly about what he believes, but again, you can judge for yourself.”
A primary debate between Trump, DeSantis, Ye and Vivek Ramaswamy would be worth watching!
Hey Tucker, here’s Nick Fuentes in a brilliant one-minute clip “Why we need White identity”
Tucker loves the Nazi stuff. Catch him at 13:20 in the Carolla interview (it’s cued):
“The endless attacks on the Whites, and I’m not defending Whites, but to attack any group as a group is by definition like a Nazi move. I can hardly believe that we’re allowing our leaders to attack an entire group of people based on their genetics. Isn’t that the one lesson we learned from Jim Crow and the Second World War is that shouldn’t be allowed, and yet it’s the defining factor of American politics.”
No Tucker, you totally cringe dude, “the one lesson” anti-Whites have taught us in regard to any historical event you care to choose (and you usually choose Nazi! Nazi!) is that Whites are evil!
Maybe that’s why you feel you have to say “And I’m not defending Whites”! Pathetic!
Does Tucker deserve some credit for pointing out that Whites are being attacked, and for calling that “the defining factor of American politics”?
History will record that this era’s defining factor in America and in all White countries was White Genocide, and that other attacks on Whites were corollaries of White Genocide.
Tucker’s attempt to to keep the attacks on Whites inside a framework based on WWII and Jim Crow, instead of inside the White Genocide framework they belong in, is just a diversion and another evocation of the anti-Whites’ charge of White evil.
You won’t catch Tucker or anyone else whose salary is paid by a media company talking about “the most important thing going on in the world today.”
Some of the content Tucker provides (e.g. attacks on Whites) may kick his audience’s natural instincts into gear and make some of them friendlier toward reminders that they are WHITE.
Tucker may be both a gatekeeper and a pipeline.
That’s typical “Tuckservatism,” Luke. Tucker highlights attacks on Whites while also highlighting that Whites organizing to do anything about it would be “Nazi-like.”
Alright! I was just informed that Tucker used the phrase “anti-White” yesterday in discussing the Democratic Party selecting Biden to run for president: “The anti-White party picked the White guy…”
Very good! I mean you could just as accurately say “The anti-White party picked the anti-White guy…”, but he’s using the term anti-White,” which helps to spread the term and that’s good.
At 37 seconds (it’s cued):
It’s going to be Gavin Newsom…
It wasn’t until recent years that you ever heard the term anti-White, as strange as that may seem. Bob Whitaker’s BUGsers worked hard for years to drive it into the mainstream: “The success of the phrase ‘Anti-White’”
Anti-Whites are calling everyone in sight “N*zis” these days, and Tucker has to chime in too?
Some people on the right seem to think that attention to the power of words and phrases is beneath them.
Wonderful article on Tucker by Dr. Kevin MacDonald! It has a comprehensive summary of his work. Here’s my comment on Dr. MacDonald’s site:
“What a great summary of Tucker’s work your linked article is! Very helpful to me, because I’ve mostly just watched clips of him, and so I haven’t had much material to think about when I would try to gauge if his good works have outweighed the negative effect of his opposition to Whites organizing as Whites to resist anti-Whiteism.
“Seeing the scope of his programs in your article, I have to think his effect has been mostly positive, but I don’t have confidence in that conclusion because I don’t have a “feel” for the extent of his negative effect. I’m in the same condition re anti-CRT hero Chris Rufo, who seems even more opposed to White “identity politics” than Tucker, saying “White identitarianism is pathetic and disgusting.”
“Chris Rufo hates Critical Race Theory but loves White Genocide!”
“But Tucker probably wouldn’t have been allowed to do the good programming he’s done if he hadn’t declared openly that it was not his intent to arouse Whites to collective action as Whites!
“So assuming Tucker pretty much continues in his same groove, having a movement of Whites organized to defend Whites awaits someone equally attractive who will make forming a movement his main project. Nick Fuentes is the only one I see at the moment who appears to be a possible in that department.”