A few years ago when we were working hard to force the term “anti-white” into the mainstream, one of our BUGSer group often ended his comments on another site with this:
Recently a TV personality being interviewed by another interrupted himself to say,
“I’m not being racist, am I?”
It will be a better world when a TV personality interrupts himself to say,
“I’m not being anti-white, am I?”
I wondered if I would live long enough to see that.
But now, just a few years later, we have Prof Ted Thornhill of Florida Gulf Coast University defending his course “White Racism” by saying,
(Lol at that whopper!*)
An anti-white, expressing public concern that his anti-white behavior might appear anti-white!
We made that happen, folks, by hammering the term “anti-white” over and over in the mainstream to force it’s usage there.
Why that achievement helps fight White Genocide is explained briefly and clearly in this article:
Now we’re also hammering the memes,
White self-hatred is SICK!!!
“Diversity” means chasing down whites**
“Professor insists ‘White Racism’ course ‘does not teach whites to hate themselves'”
“Resettlement director insists that moving Somalis into Whitesburg ‘is not chasing down whites’”
Sound absurd? Seven or eight years ago, when we seriously started hammering “anti-white” and “White Genocide” into the mainstream, imagining an anti-white using the term “anti-white” seemed absurd too.
It especially seemed absurd to imagine a mainstream professor using the term seriously, in a way that accepts the term’s validity, rather than bringing up the term only to make fun of it, which is what happened at first.
That last point is an extremely important one. Most pro-whites have resisted using the term “White Genocide,” not wanting to be made fun of. But being made fun of comes first…we’re seeing now the same slow transitioning of the term “White Genocide” from being mentioned only as a “joke” to being used seriously.
So much time could be saved if pro-whites could realize how that works.
Let’s end on a chuckle offered by Prof Thornhill:
“However, all people racialized as white derive, in some measure, material and psychological benefits by virtue of being racialized as white.”
“’Racialized‘ as white”?! 🙂 On a hunch, I googled “genderized as male,” but apparently mommy professors and other sophomores haven’t received the memo to use that one yet.
Wait for it.
In the meantime, Merry Christmas, everyone! 🎄
* His course “White Racism” could conceivably not be anti-white only if there were also courses titled “Black Racism,” “Hispanic Racism,” etc.; or courses that offered critical analysis of the behavior of other races in any way at all that didn’t place all blame on “white racism.” But of course there aren’t. His course exists to condition white students to accept White Genocide.