This was posted elsewhere by our poster White GeNOcide:
A leading purpose of yesterday’s hearing was to propagate Chairman Deutch’s favored anti-white meme, “White Nationalist terrorism” (check out the first few minutes of Chairman Deutch’s opening remarks. Anti-whites are extremely conscious meme-makers).
We’ve told you guys forever to drop the obscure term “white nationalist” and use “pro-white.” Ordinary white people have no idea what you mean by “white nationalist.” For them the term is just a blank slate that anti-whites can write ANYTHING on.
So now Chairman Deutch and the rest of the anti-white mob get to tell whites their version of what you mean by the name you’ve given yourself. Their version is “A ‘white nationalist’ is a terrorist.”
.
The term “Pro-white” is NOT a blank slate that anti-whites can write anything on. “Pro-white” obviously means supporting in some way what’s good for whites. Clearly that doesn’t have to involve terrorism, so anti-whites trying to make “pro-whites” just a variety of “terrorists” would sound foolish.
Think how the phrase formed by tacking “terrorism” onto “Pro-white” sounds, and what kind of discussion it would invite. Every time Chairman Deutch would repeat the term “pro-white,” he’d be putting into white minds the brand new idea that whites could support what’s good for whites! But the term “white nationalist” seems to vaguely hint at something more (or less?) than just being pro-white.
“Pro-white” is simple and it’s alive. “White Nationalism” gives off the dead scent of a title to a boring ideological essay.
It’s way past time to start listening to Bob Whitaker’s wisdom, folks: White Nationalist or Pro-White?
Bob wrote that in 2013. Six years later, pro-whites are still calling themselves “white nationalists,” which as Bob mentions, anti-whites love.
You think Chairman Deutch doesn’t love it??
Impressive how this site keeps a full-court press to give other pro-whites the startling information that terminology is important.
I also note that Chairman Deutch’s bio offers no surprises, nor does Chairman Rose’s.
The movement block-heads will go to the gulags ignoring Bob Whitaker. Just before they are disappeared for good, they will shout, we were right! Then no one will remember them.
A couple of comments from Committee members during the hearing:
“‘Immigrant invasion’ — that’s the rhetoric of terrorism.” (Mr. Malinowski, at time 1:29:29 — 1:30:00)
“White Nationalism should be considered terrorism.” (Ilhan Omar, at time 1:51:21)
I agree with the author of this article that anti-whites would have a harder time saying, “Being pro-white should be considered terrorism.”
A second joint Congressional committee held a hearing today on roughly the same topic:
House Oversight Joint Subcommittee Hearing on Confronting White Supremacy | C-SPAN.org
In this clip, witness Candace Owens beats up on witness Kathleen Belew pretty bad:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1175081910726463488
Dr. Belew‘s opening sentence shows her high regard for herself:
“As one of the only scholars who has studied this troubling phenomenon deeply, and has historical knowledge of its patterns and…” (17:52)
The third witness, Georgetown University Law professor Joshua Geltzer, said this:
“For tech companies, it means policing their platforms, to remove not just incitement to violence, but also the ideological foundations that spawn such violence.” (27:28)
In a nice Orwellian touch, Geltzer is also the founding Executive Director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.
@ Luke:
“I also note that Chairman Deutch’s bio offers no surprises, nor does Chairman Rose’s.”
Nor does the bio of the second hearing’s chairman, Jamie Raskin.
Anti-whites who take care to always exhibit a persona of balanced reasonableness invariably preface their opposition to free speech with a statement that they support free speech. This concluding statement by the third witness (the curly-haired woman, I didn’t get her name) in the second hearing is a bit in that mode:
“…whatever we do in encountering violent white supremacy…needs to be mindful of our Constitution and our First Amendment, but there is an important difference between the types of ideas that lead to violence and the type of ideas we’re comfortable with people holding.” (at 2:52:04)
Of course she’s speaking more or less extemporaneously, but still…if it was a slip, it was a slip that revealed her actual position. These people are the quiet fascists who work diligently to shut you up because you make them uncomfortable.
They’re horrified that anyone would openly express views that they fundamentally oppose.
They’re horrified that in 2019 any person would openly oppose White Genocide.
And they understand that any government that is carrying out a genocide against its own people can’t allow free speech.
@Sylvie:
“White Nationalism should be considered terrorism.” (Ilhan Omar, at time 1:51:21)
Here’s a 20 second video clip of Ilhan Omar saying that:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1174530565674024960
We are Pro-Whites, not “White Nationalists” – Fight White Genocide
Don’t choose a name that anti-whites can redefine!
Here’s an excerpt from an excellent comment on another site — I edited it and added boldfacing:
Dr. Geltzer (see WHITE GENOCIDE’s first comment above) testifying: