The professor tried to defend his tweet by following it with ““..when the whites were massacred during the Haitian revolution, that was a very good thing indeed.”
In a statement released by the professor he stated that “White supremacy is on the rise, and we must fight it by any means. In that fight, universities will need to choose whether they are on the side of free expression and academic debate, or on the side of the racist mob”
So we decided to take the professor up on his statement and have asked Drexel University to facilitate an open discussion between our spokesman Bob Whitaker and Professor George Ciccariello-Maher.
Last week our team at FWG sent the following letter to the President of Drexel University, John Fry and a copy to their Executive Director of Media Relations, Niki Gianakaris. It has also be emailed out to various media outlets who have reported on this story:
Office of The President
Att: John A. Fry
3141 Chestnut Street, Suite 103
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Dear President Fry:
My name is Laura Fitz-Gerald. I am the proprietor of fightwhitegenocide.com and a member of a group of human rights activists calling attention to the crime of white genocide.
I am contacting you today in regard to one of your professors, George Ciccariello-Maher, who tweeted on Christmas Eve, “All I want for Christmas is white genocide.”
It is deeply sickening to see that the university has condoned such a tweet from one of its professors, with no consequence for the professor.
The professor called for the genocide of an entire race. Genocide is a crime. He also posted on twitter, “..when the whites were massacred during the Haitian revolution, that was a very good thing indeed.” Does Professor Ciccariello-Maher think Turkish genocide would be a very good thing indeed, since Turks kidnapped and enslaved millions of white people?
If a professor at Drexel University had called for Black Genocide, or for Japanese Genocide, even in jest, would that professor still have a job?
In a statement released by the professor, he stated, “White supremacy is on the rise, and we must fight it by any means. In that fight, universities will need to choose whether they are on the side of free expression and academic debate, or on the side of the racist mob.”
The only mobs I see on campuses are mobs of thugs who threaten violence against any speaker who dares to commit heresy against the Religion of Political Correctness as promulgated by its professor priesthood. The only people I see calling for speech restrictions are the anti-whites posing as “anti-racists” who call any defense of white people “hate speech.”
Professor Ciccariello-Maher claims to believe in “free expression and academic debate,” so I ask Drexel University to facilitate an open discussion between the professor and our spokesman, Mr. Bob Whitaker.
I think we deserve a chance to confront someone who considers opposition to genocide “supremacy.” President Obama himself says America will inevitably become browner. Anti-whites openly brag about turning white countries non-white. We just call that policy what it is: white genocide. The UN Convention on Genocide defines genocide as any attempt to eliminate a race in whole or in part. Let professor Ciccariello-Maher explain how flooding every white country with millions and millions of non-whites and force-integrating them by law does not fit the definition of genocide under international law.
Mr. Whitaker created the campaign that has made White Genocide a public issue, and he has also been a college professor, an international aviation negotiator, a Capitol Hill senior staffer, Reagan appointee and a writer for the Voice of America.
Is Drexel University truly on the side of free debate? Is professor Ciccariello-Maher prepared to defend his position in open debate, or will he and Drexel University hide behind their mob of thugs and say, “Oh, we can’t do that. There might be violence!” I look forward to hearing from you and working together to have an open discussion on this issue.
Proprietor of FWG
On Sunday the 29th we received this comic response from the University:
Let me reply on President Fry’s behalf. Thanks for taking time to send your insights. We will certainly consider your message and suggestions as we do our event planning.
Best Regards, -Brian
M. Brian Blake, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President and Provost
Distinguished University Professor of Systems and Software Engineering
3141 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-2875
The letter has now been emailed to several people in the Drexel administration and has been printed and mailed to their offices as well. It has also been sent to multiple media outlets who have reported on this story such as philly.com, Heat Street and The College Fix.
The group ESAWG (Educators and Students Against White Genocide) have also been sending out mass emailing to Drexel staff and students. – http://whitegenocideproject.com/drexel-prof-ciccariello-maher-choose-trump-whitaker-debate/
Our spokesman Bob Whitaker also recently contacted Professor Ciccariello-Maher, sending him the following letter (this letter has also been sent to President Fry and media outlets):
Mr George Ciccariello-Maher,
In a statement you released regarding your tweet that called for the genocide of an entire race, you stated “White supremacy is on the rise, and we must fight it by any means. In that fight, universities will need to choose whether they are on the side of free expression and academic debate, or on the side of the racist mob.”
What is this independent industry you refer to as “universities”?
You seem too use this collective term “universities” as denoting a single self-financing institution that’s charged with taking certain political stands.
Political stands not even determined by the public that provides the financing, but determined by you.
I have heard this sort of collective referred to as “the intellectuals” in the ravings of self styled Marxists. You declare that you are a Communist. I was in those “Communist” countries while the Iron Curtain still stood.
Every single self-described “Communist” country maintained a guarded wall around it. Anyone who tried to get out of such a Communist country, your ideal country, was shot.
I SAW them.
“Communists” talk about how they build Workers’ Paradises, and no Communist ever explains why EVERY Communist country is, in Plain English, a prison. No one at any university ever asks this question, Mr George Ciccariello-Maher.
Trump is attacked for wanting a wall to keep working people OUT of the United States. But it makes not the slightest difference to you Marxist intellectuals whether working people want to live IN Communist states that hold them captive. The question never comes up in your “universities” because you couldn’t care less about what real working people want.
With the EXCEPTION of your Communist states, since they have no choice, non-white populations want to live in white-skinned countries. You never try to explain this reality. If white people try your diversity and discover, for the millionth time, it is miserable, you demand that the government, ONCE AGAIN, chase the whites down with diversity, racial balancing, immigration, integration and all the other names you come up with for chasing white people down.
You have no objection to overwhelmingly black countries. You don’t sound the alarm when an area is overwhelmingly Oriental.
You are after whites. You have only one goal: that is there be no overwhelmingly WHITE country.
The Nazis wanted a world that was Judenfrei. You demand a world that is Weissenfrei.
Robert W. Whitaker